subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Sat, Jul 04 2009 
Breaking News:  Palin resigning as Alaska governor  July 03, 2009 05:33 pm

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published October 18, 2007 11:44 pm - FORT WAYNE — State officials have decided to fight a lawsuit challenging a rule banning high-fenced hunting preserves in Indiana.


State decides to fight lawsuit over hunting preserves



FORT WAYNE, Ind. (AP) — State officials have decided to fight a lawsuit challenging a rule banning high-fenced hunting preserves in Indiana.

The Department of Natural Resources had entered into settlement negotiations in August 2006, but more than a year later, the legal wrangling continues, The Journal Gazette reported in a story Thursday.

The issue started festering in the late 1990s when several facilities sprang up under the guise of a game breeder’s license. The owners charged thousands of dollars for hunters to come in and shoot deer bred specifically for large antlers.

In 2005, then-DNR Director Kyle Hupfer said he would implement an emergency — and later permanent — rule banning the operations. The intent was to clarify current regulations and establish new ones regarding what some call canned hunting — paying to shoot deer behind fences.

Hundreds of deer farms in Indiana have white-tailed deer and other animals under a game breeder’s permit, but only a few allow hunting.

Hupfer determined that while the permit allows for the possession, breeding and sale of white-tailed deer, it does not authorize the hunting or purposeful killing of them.

Preserve owners disagreed, saying former DNR officials gave them permission to open up.

Rodney Bruce, the owner of Whitetail Bluff near the southern Indiana town of Corydon, sued in 2005 and obtained a court injunction preventing the DNR from enforcing the ban on his property.

The General Assembly tried to intervene in 2006 but failed, which prompted negotiations to start in earnest.

The idea was to allow existing preserves to continue operating for about 10 more years so they could recoup their investment. Various versions of the settlement required the owners to admit the activity is illegal and to cease at the end of the established window.

Nine more preserves or owners were added to the lawsuit as plaintiffs so they could sign onto any agreement reached. They now have the protection of the same initial injunction against enforcement that Bruce received.

Settlement negotiations ceased after Robert Carter became the new DNR director when Hupfer left the position in December.

Adam Warnke, the DNR’s deputy director and chief counsel, told The Journal Gazette that the talks were stopped as “we determined that an acceptable settlement wasn’t possible, so we elected to fight the lawsuit.”

Doug Allman of the Indiana Deer Hunters Association is pleased about the agency’s changed stance on the hunting preserves.

“They just aren’t popular, and the Michael Vick thing isn’t helping,” he said, referring to dogfighting charges against the NFL star. “People just aren’t willing to accept these preserves.”



print this story    email this story    comment on this story   

Click to discuss this story with other readers on our forums.

Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.
Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.




Zillow
monster
autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Sign up for Herald Bulletin
Email & Text Alerts







Premier Guide
Find a job! Find a Home! Find a car!


 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index